Text decision tree
Adapted from Chapter 88 of Decision Trees: Frameworks for Technology Choices. Sources reviewed 2026-11-07.
START: A sourcing choice is conditional. Benchmark the actual workload and compare full cost.
Q1. Physical control required by policy?
Yes -> Evaluate controlled infrastructure. Owned DGX or an approved location. [Q2]
No -> Otherwise continue to the demand question. [Q2]
Q2. Demand is uncertain or short lived?
Yes -> Start with flexible GPU capacity. GPU clouds offer compute capacity. [Q3]
No -> For predictable demand, consider who will operate the infrastructure. [Q3]
Q3. Team can operate the GPU systems?
Yes -> Compare owned and reserved capacity. Operator inputs: staff, energy, downtime. [Q4]
No -> Otherwise evaluate a managed service and verify its actual operating responsibilities. [Q4]
Q4. Final check: workload fit and full cost
Yes -> Pilot the shortlisted capacity. Verify fabric, data location and recovery. [END]
END: Validate GPU availability, interconnect, data movement and recovery. Keep a tested capacity fallback.
AI-generated chapter illustration
Conceptual illustration for Choose how to source GPU compute
The illustration groups named sourcing categories in one row. The graph applies control, demand and operating gates in order, then validates the shortlist. A logo or category label in the illustration does not establish purchasable capacity or contract terms.
The illustration was generated in BookWriter. Its visual arrangement is interpretive; use the explicit nodes and routes in the graph and text tree for the decision.
Primary references
- NVIDIA Cloud Partners Scale Across Europe
- From Training to Production, NVIDIA and CoreWeave Close the Loop on Agentic
- NVIDIA and Oracle Expand NVIDIA Vera Rubin to Multi-Gigawatt Scale and Bring
- Google Cloud and NVIDIA expand co-engineering collaboration to scale infrastruct
- NVIDIA DGX Platform
- NVIDIA DGX Cloud
- GPU machine types Stay organized with collections Save and categorize content ba